Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Codename GN21-X6) is a high-end laptop GPU. It is based on the AD106 chip and use the Ada Lovelace architecture. The RTX 4070 offers 4,608 cores (of the 7,680 in the AD106) and a 128 Bit memory bus. The RTX 4070 mobile uses 8 GB GDDR6 dedicated graphics memory with a clock speed of 16 Gbps (effective). The TGP (Total Graphics Power) can be configured between 35 and 115 Watt (+ 15-25 Watt Dynamic Boost from the CPU) leading to different performance levels (the desktop RTX 4070 Ti uses 285 Watt for comparisons). The boost clock speed ranges from 1230 MHz (at 35 Watt TGP) up to 2175 MHz (115W). Therefore, the performance is also depending a lot on the power setting used for the RTX 4080 mobile in the laptop.

The performance should be below the desktop RTX 4070 Ti and therefore best suited for 2k and maximum details for demanding games of 2022.

Our synthetic benchmarks of an average RTX 4070 mobile show a performance slightly below a mobile RTX 3080 Ti. However, with reduced power limits, the performance is clearly suffering, e.g. only 70% in Time Spy for a version with 60W TDP. In games, a fast RTX 4070 is best suited for QHD gaming, where some very demanding games wont reach the 60 fps limit (and may have to run at 1080p, reduced settings or using DLSS). See below for detailed gaming benchmarks of various cards.

The RTX 4070 offers 144 tensor cores (4th gen) that enable DLSS 3 including frame generation for supported games. Furthermore, 36 raytracing cores (4rd gen) can be used for raytracing effects in supported games.

The AD106 chip is manufactured in 5nm at TSMC (4N process).

GeForce RTX 4000 Laptop GPU Series

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU compare 9728 @ 2.04 GHz256 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU compare 7424 @ 1.86 - 2.28 GHz192 Bit @ 20000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 4608 @ 2.18 GHz128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU compare 3072 @ 2.37 GHz128 Bit @ 16000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 2.37 GHz96 Bit @ 16000 MHz
CodenameGN21-X6
ArchitectureAda Lovelace
Pipelines4608 - unified
TMUs144
ROPs48
Raytracing Cores36
Tensor / AI Cores144
Core Speed2175 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance15.6 TFLOPS FP16, 15.6 TFLOPS FP32
CacheL2: 32 MB
Memory Speed16000 effective = 2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth256 GB/s
APIDirectX 12 Ultimate, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
technology5 nm
PCIe4.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement03.01.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
PredecessorGeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
13.6 pt (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5860     avg: 11761     median: 12098 (35%)     max: 13446 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6241     avg: 11578     median: 11957.5 (32%)     max: 13040 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 34191     avg: 61606     median: 64548.5 (69%)     max: 70329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 54238     avg: 153738     median: 162953 (43%)     max: 193851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 13535     avg: 25584     median: 26016 (46%)     max: 29083 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 16212     avg: 28987     median: 29876 (34%)     max: 32810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 93493     avg: 250533     median: 231594 (28%)     max: 445451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 21125     avg: 22414     median: 22127 (26%)     max: 24275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 49879     avg: 53914     median: 53913.5 (51%)     max: 57948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 84468     avg: 98568     median: 98568 (38%)     max: 112668 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 22258     avg: 33309     median: 34455 (48%)     max: 36692 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 24229     avg: 39926     median: 41011 (35%)     max: 45606 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 94245     avg: 97154     median: 97153.5 (28%)     max: 100062 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 100299     avg: 106532     median: 106532 (60%)     max: 112764 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 47449     avg: 57111     median: 55349.5 (76%)     max: 64608 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 32     avg: 39.2     median: 36 (5%)     max: 136 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 19     avg: 22     median: 21 (8%)     max: 28 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
specvp12 maya-04 +
specvp12 energy-01 +
specvp12 creo-01 +
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 109.63     avg: 113     median: 114 (35%)     max: 115.44 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 20.7     avg: 22.1     median: 22.8 (3%)     max: 22.97 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 111.17     avg: 116.8     median: 117 (25%)     max: 122.16 fps
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 74.35     avg: 77.5     median: 77.9 (21%)     max: 80.13 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 41     avg: 41.7     median: 41.9 (18%)     max: 42.07 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 150.22     avg: 154.3     median: 154 (19%)     max: 158.82 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p +
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 22     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (4%)     max: 22.59 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 32.2     avg: 34.7     median: 34.8 (38%)     max: 36.9 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p +
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 41.3     avg: 42     median: 41.9 (38%)     max: 42.9 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 108.9     avg: 112.5     median: 111.8 (66%)     max: 117.49 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 63.45     avg: 65.1     median: 64.1 (49%)     max: 68.6 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 96.87     avg: 98.5     median: 98.6 (46%)     max: 99.85 fps
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 13.87     avg: 24.9     median: 24.9 (32%)     max: 35.9 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 v1 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
min: 213.77     avg: 299.9     median: 299.9 (49%)     max: 386 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 138.8     avg: 225.1     median: 225.5 (13%)     max: 292 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 502     median: 229.5 (6%)     max: 1354 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 109311     avg: 117570     median: 118432 (34%)     max: 122175 points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 18099     avg: 45744     median: 27484.5 (9%)     max: 111636 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 80.8     avg: 158.7     median: 164.8 (23%)     max: 276 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 81.2     avg: 153.6     median: 161.8 (23%)     max: 196.4 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 95.4     avg: 162.5     median: 168.8 (37%)     max: 265 Watt
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4151     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (66%)     max: 0.846 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.553     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (59%)     max: 0.901 fps per Watt
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
min: 2100     avg: 2217     median: 2295 (90%)     max: 2295 MHz
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
med. 1920x1080
156  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
108  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
78  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
48  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Extreme Preset + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
55
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
79.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
75.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Preset + High Ray Tracing 1920x1080
31.7
High Preset + High Ray Tracing + Quality DLSS + FG 3840x2160
16.8
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
96.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
84.1 85.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.6 63.4 ~ 63 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
44.3 45.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29.1 29.8 ~ 29 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
141.4
Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality 3840x2160
29.1
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
385.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
239.5 263 ~ 251 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
146.2 166 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
113.3 129 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87.2 95.4 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
47.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
446.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132 137 ~ 135 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
125 129 ~ 127 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97 99 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
74 75 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra High Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) + DLSS Quality 3840x2160
59
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
med. 1920x1080
192.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
162.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
150.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
138.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
82.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
med. 1920x1080
182.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
170.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
141  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
100.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
131.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.2 120 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
98.3 102 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
87.9 89.5 ~ 89 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
55.4 57.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
134.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
41.2
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
29.6
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
206  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
182 188.5 ~ 185 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
159.8 165.4 ~ 163 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
140.1 148.1 ~ 144 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
97.3 98.8 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
255
Best Preset + DLSS Quality 3840x2160
75.5
The Crew Motorfest

The Crew Motorfest

2023
med. 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60 60 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Starfield

Starfield

2023
med. 1920x1080
62.3 66.7 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.2 52.3 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.6 46.6 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
37.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
92.1 102.5 109.7 110.1 ~ 104 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91.1 101.9 109.2 109.4 ~ 103 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
87.2 97 106.4 107 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
76.2 85 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
56 57.1 57.3 61.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.1 46.9 46.9 49.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
32 35 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra + Quality DLSS + FG 16xAF 3840x2160
39.5
med. 1920x1080
113.2 124.7 133.8 143.1 ~ 129 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
106.5 119.9 126.7 132.4 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
105.3 106.1 106.6 111.1 ~ 107 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
80.6 89.5 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
137.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
113.9 114.2 115.2 125.4 ~ 117 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
91.4 95.3 99.1 105.6 ~ 98 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
88.5 94.4 95.4 100.2 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.2 62.5 70.9 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
162.7
Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS 3840x2160
58
low 1920x1080
90.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
72.3 72.5 78.8 79.5 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58 60.2 62.3 64.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.3 56.3 57.1 58.1 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
48.7 48.8 49.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
109.7
Very High Preset + Very High Raytracing TAA 1920x1080
44.8
43.4
Very High Preset + Very High Raytracing + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
13.3
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
230 248 248 279 ~ 251 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
232 251 251 255 261 ~ 250 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
189 198 198.2 199.2 209 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.6 68 71 71.7 100 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45 45.6 46 46.3 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
232
221
237
281
Ultra High Preset + DLSS Quality (+ FG) 16xAF 3840x2160
38
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
242 255 ~ 249 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
227 233 ~ 230 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
207 208 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
177.8 182.9 ~ 180 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
105.4 120.7 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
60.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
282
Ultra Preset + DLSS Quality + FG 3840x2160
82.6
low 1920x1080
84 92.1 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
76 80.6 94.9 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72 75.6 79 79.1 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67 71.1 73 75 77.9 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44 45 46.7 47 50.4 ~ 47 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.7 24.2 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
117.4
Epic Preset + Ray Tracing 1920x1080
57
56.7
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
167.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
161.7 224 ~ 193 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
151.9 190.7 ~ 171 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
143.4 178.5 ~ 161 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
106.6 116.7 ~ 112 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
171
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
73.1 98.6 114.4 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.9 85.9 96.5 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
56.9 77.7 85.5 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
56 69.5 69.9 75 ~ 68 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.7 41.7 43.9 53.3 ~ 45 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
92.9
137.3
109.4
low 1920x1080
119.3 160.1 185.9 ~ 155 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
108.3 117.6 123.4 133.5 ~ 121 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
105.5 111.5 113.1 120.8 ~ 113 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
74.8 80.5 82.4 86.7 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.5 61.3 61.5 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
231
189.7
120.6
low 1920x1080
211.8 228.9 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
174 186 191.4 205.1 ~ 189 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135 155 156.5 159.7 ~ 152 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
134 150 153.9 157.5 ~ 149 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
107 114.8 115.1 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
307.4
237.2
low 1920x1080
98.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
73.3 86.8 88.1 92.1 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
71.9 83.3 85.8 88.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
71.1 82.3 85.4 87.5 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61 69.5 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
101.8
low 1920x1080
176.6 199.8 ~ 188 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
131.7 132.5 147.4 158.3 ~ 142 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
86.2 95 95.1 96.4 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
70.4 74.2 78 79 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.6 58.6 58.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
208
181.7
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
65 72 83 87 93 109 115 115 117 119 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69 71 81 85 90 111 112 114 115 115 117 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64 67 76 81 85 101 101 102 104 104 106 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54 59 61 73 77 79 85 87 88 88 90 ~ 76 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39 41 52 52 55 63 63 64 64 66 66 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21 21 27 28 29 37 39 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
150
126
144
139
Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
75
73
74
71
med. 1920x1080
142.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
57 86 121.2 123 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41 71 77.2 101.2 107 ~ 79 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35 50 50 55.3 71 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
27.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing High TAA 1920x1080
43.9
low 1920x1080
97 100.9 102.8 ~ 100 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94 95.7 98.2 ~ 96 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
81 85.3 86.7 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
80 82.4 86.5 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51 53.1 56.5 ~ 54 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
135.5
133.4
high 1920x1080
101  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
RT Ultra Preset / On FXAA 1920x1080
36
low 1920x1080
220 236 ~ 228 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
166.2 178 178.7 185.9 ~ 177 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
126.7 131.6 134.1 141.6 ~ 134 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
101.9 108.5 110.6 114 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
64.5 66.9 68.5 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
269
234
low 1920x1080
122.8 155.6 162.8 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
113.8 127.5 142.2 ~ 128 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
111.8 121.8 136 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.9 79.7 83.5 88 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
58.4 59.1 66.7 68.3 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
168.4
128.5
170.9
Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
50.8
58.1
56.8
70
low 1920x1080
118.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
112.1 131.1 ~ 122 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
101 110.1 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89.1 97.2 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
67.7 77.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
36.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
119.6
high 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82.3 90.5 110 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.1 68.9 86 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
40.5 44 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing TAA 1920x0180
71.4
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
80 100 100 101 102 105 105 108 ~ 100 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59 71 72 72 72 74 76 77 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
39 41 44 47 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Extreme Quality Preset DLSS Balanced T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
71
low 1920x1080
92.7 94 ~ 93 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.4 92.4 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
84.4 86.2 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82.1 82.7 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
61 61.2 ~ 61 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
102.9
med. 1920x1080
67.2 74.6 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
58.9 65.6 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.9 57.5 ~ 56 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
QHD 2560x1440
166.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
146  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
122.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
28.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
138.5 151 155.1 192.3 206 220 225 232 239 256 256 258 262 275 279 301 310 311 ~ 237 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
133.8 145.8 148.5 190 196.4 214 220 221 222 228 242 246 251 261 264 273 275 289 300 306 ~ 231 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109 111.2 123.5 140.1 158.2 163 173.8 182 183 183.4 186.7 189.4 193.7 195.2 205 206 211 219 221 222 225 231 235 ~ 186 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.2 54 59.4 60.7 61.8 66.6 71 71.4 71.8 72.6 76.6 76.7 77.8 78.2 78.7 79.3 79.3 79.3 81.5 81.7 83.1 83.9 84.1 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
10.6 36 39.4 40.9 42.4 44.3 46.2 47 47.1 47.8 48.4 49 49.7 50.3 50.4 50.8 51.1 51.9 52.2 53.3 53.8 54.8 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
4.7 18.8 21.5 24.5 24.7 25.4 25.9 25.9 26.4 26.5 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
296
256
368
333
63.1
365
199.1
308
312
398
254
277
276
321
196.4
366
335
med. 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
199.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
195.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
148.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
78.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
172.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
171.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
165.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
108.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
52.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing 1920x1080
73
69.6
low 1920x1080
98.1 183.5 227.5 230 241.7 244.3 263.6 ~ 213 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92.5 153.3 190.1 193.9 195.6 204.8 217.3 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74.3 104.9 130.3 132.5 132.5 143.7 144.5 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.6 79.7 82.4 98 101.7 102 103.2 112.1 113.9 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.8 55.7 57.6 69.1 70.4 70.5 71.4 76.9 78.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.3 33.6 37 37.4 39.2 39.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
319
low 1920x1080
55.3 102.1 106 128.5 129 130 135.4 138.3 147 147.8 155.9 182.8 185.8 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70 99.4 102 104 113 113.8 115 118.1 125.7 141.3 141.9 152.9 157.6 ~ 120 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.5 71 85.6 86 89 95 95.3 96 96.7 98 100.7 101 103 106.1 111.5 112 115.1 121.3 ~ 97 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48 65 71 71.6 82 82 83.3 83.6 84.8 86 86.7 87 87.5 88.8 90 90.7 91 91 92.1 93.6 98.9 102.3 110 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30 42 43 52 53.1 53.3 53.4 53.5 53.9 54 54 54.4 54.5 54.5 54.5 55.4 55.6 57 57.5 58.1 61 61 63.9 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.8 18.7 19.6 23.1 23.3 23.5 23.9 24 24.4 24.7 26 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
148.4
129
161.3
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 1920x1080
65
42
36.2
57.1
41
Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) 3840x2160
7.8
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
med. 1920x1080
118.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
118.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
112.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
78.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
40  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
182.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
164.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
150.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
131.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
112.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
186.1
med. 1920x1080
59.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Raytracing 1920x1080
42
med. 1920x1080
253  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
240  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
188  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
125  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
64  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
143.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
119.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
95.6 109 ~ 102 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.8 80 ~ 74 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58.5 65 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
182.7
med. 1920x1080
172.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
149.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
140.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
102.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
57.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
203  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
148.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
138.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
137  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
94.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
87  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
148  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
147  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
108  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
60  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
85
med. 1920x1080
252  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
221  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
209  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
129.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
73.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
168.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
126.5 144 ~ 135 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89 92 105 110 114.5 126 ~ 106 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
70 77 86.7 87 88 91 ~ 83 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
43 48 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
158.5
Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR TAA 1920x1080
78
85.2
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
med. 1920x1080
139.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
129.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
106.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
65.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
37.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
339 378 441 520 ~ 420 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
182.6 276 300 336 407 ~ 300 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
162.5 234 238 264 306 ~ 241 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
118.4 133.1 139.5 149.8 157.5 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
88.6 104.3 108.5 110.9 114.7 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
63.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
med. 1920x1080
173.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
154.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
119.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1920x1080
220  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
212  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
189.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
128.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ray Tracing Preset 1920x1080
115.6
Outriders

Outriders

2021
med. 1920x1080
165.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
145.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
129.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
90  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
46.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
294.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
234  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
208.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
197.4  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
129.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
68.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
284.1
ultra 1920x1080
86 101 106 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
65 75 78 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41 43 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
high 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
33  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
45
low 1280x720
158.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
117.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
82.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
50.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low-End TAAAA 1920x1080
151.8
high 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
126  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
98  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
52  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
331  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
276  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
235  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
183  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
142.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
175.9 258.5 ~ 217 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
145.9 200.1 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
119.7 131.8 139 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98.6 100.3 109 ~ 103 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
68.7 71.5 75 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
35.7 40 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
252.8
166.7
low 1280x720
165  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
140  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
135  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
105  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
208.9 221 ~ 215 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
139.8 141.3 ~ 141 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109.7 109.8 117 ~ 112 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86.8 87.2 91 ~ 88 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
69 69.1 72 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
44 46 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Quality DXR 16xAF 1920x1080
78
74.4
74.3
low 1280x720
206  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
163.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
158.1 172 ~ 165 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117 131 137 145.9 153 158 158 168 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
86 99 102 103 104 107 110 129 ~ 105 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50 53 53 70 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
183.7
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
315 334 340 362 367 375 390 393 414 431 464 468 470 476 481 483 485 490 537 544 567 636 ~ 446 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
162.1 172.1 224 238 242 249 249 270 273 277 278 280 286 295 295 295 300 300 302 309 310 310 315 316 326 332 334 ~ 279 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
136.6 150.6 173.9 192 192.4 202 215 215 221 221 223 225 230 231 232 233 235 235 237 243 244 245 245 247 249 249 252 255 259 260 ~ 225 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
117.7 142.7 148.7 165.4 174.8 180.5 190.3 192 192.6 194 195 196.7 200 201 202 202 202 203 204 208 208 208 209 209 210 211 214 217 218 223 228 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
79.9 95.3 106.2 113.6 122.8 129 131.4 131.6 132 132 132.8 133.2 133.3 133.5 133.6 134.3 135.2 136.7 138.1 138.8 139.8 143.3 146.4 149.2 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
42.7 61.7 67.6 70.4 71.4 71.9 74.7 75.3 75.7 76.8 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
141 168 178 183 187 188 190 202 ~ 180 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
119 120 134 156 157 157 161 162 163 163 168 179 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
98 116 118 127 141 145 149 150 151 153 154 154 154 159 169 ~ 143 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
92 109 116 120 132 136 140 141 143 144 144 145 145 149 158 ~ 134 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
79 95 102 108 111 112 113 114 115 117 117 118 122 ~ 109 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
55 60 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
185
175
178
182
176
129
170
low 1280x720
100.5 106.3 107 121 121.6 123.7 134.2 136 146 147.6 154.6 154.8 158.5 160 162.3 164.9 165.7 166.7 169.3 172.4 181.6 182.3 182.9 186.3 189.4 191.5 203 212 ~ 157 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.6 94.2 98 103.8 107.3 108.3 116.6 118.3 130.6 130.8 133.1 138.4 141.8 142.1 142.4 143.3 145.5 145.8 146.4 148 151.8 155.2 155.9 158.7 164.3 165.6 169.8 178.9 187.1 ~ 138 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
72.2 76.3 78.4 84.8 85.5 86.2 87.8 90.6 95.4 102 106.4 109.7 110.2 110.3 112.6 113.4 113.4 115.3 117.1 117.8 119.5 120.8 121.2 122.4 123 128.5 129.2 131.1 132.9 137.9 144.4 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
67.3 73.4 76.6 85.7 90 98.5 99.5 102.2 103.4 105.7 109.2 114 117.7 122.7 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
108.6 174.8 175.3 186.2 191.3 198.5 202 208 213 213 215 216 219 220 220 227 227 229 231 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
84 121.8 128.2 128.3 132.3 141.1 143.2 144.4 145 147.7 150.5 153.1 154.2 159.1 159.8 162.3 162.4 163.9 164.8 166.3 166.9 167.2 168.8 171.4 172.5 173.7 175.2 177.3 ~ 153 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66 82 93.3 94.7 106.3 108.3 108.7 109 109.1 109.3 111.9 113.9 114.3 114.3 114.7 114.8 115 115.2 115.4 115.5 115.5 116.1 116.2 117.5 119.4 119.9 121.2 121.2 122.7 124.8 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
48.8 60.2 69.9 71.6 79.5 81.2 81.3 81.6 82 82.6 82.6 83.3 83.7 83.8 84.1 84.1 84.4 84.7 84.7 85.2 86.1 86.2 88.4 88.6 91 91.4 119.9 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.6 38.2 40.3 46.1 46.1 46.6 46.7 46.9 47.1 47.5 47.5 48.8 49.2 51.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
135.8 137.7 149.5 161.2 164.1 164.7 166.4 171 173.9 174 178.4 186.9 189.5 189.6 191.9 193.5 199.2 203 203 205 210 212 213 215 225 233 238 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122.8 130.5 131.9 147.9 149.2 152 152.5 153.5 157 158 161.3 163.1 167.6 169 173.2 174.5 181.1 182.3 183.2 183.3 185.1 187.5 187.9 192 192.8 200 203 206 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99.7 114.5 118.9 127.7 139.3 142.2 142.8 143.6 144.1 146.3 147.6 150.9 152.4 160.5 161.1 162.4 164.4 165.9 169.8 169.9 171.5 172.5 175.8 176.5 177.3 184.4 187.2 188.4 191 191.8 195.4 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
97.4 108.3 114.8 119.5 131.6 134.8 135 136.1 137 137.8 138.5 143.8 144.5 149.4 149.9 154.7 154.7 156.9 158.8 162.2 162.8 163.4 164.5 165.3 166.3 168.4 170.2 171.6 178.6 180.6 182 ~ 150 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
88.4 107 108 117.3 118.6 128.3 132.4 136.9 141.3 142.5 145.5 146.6 150.7 151.5 ~ 130 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
322.5 335.2 354.2 364.2 415.2 432.4 452.3 459.3 474.9 484.7 500.9 545 597 606.3 617 ~ 464 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
233.3 291.5 295.9 297.6 356.8 365.4 366.3 371.8 375.9 379 390.5 391.4 405.9 415.1 430.3 ~ 358 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123.9 161 181.4 213.3 216 218.5 222.7 223 225.9 226 226 226.7 228.3 230.9 231.4 236 237 240.9 242.3 245.2 249 257.3 258 260.5 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.8 71 75 83.2 94 96.2 103 105.3 105.4 106.9 107.1 109.5 110 111.8 112 113.2 113.9 114 115 116 116 117 117 117.9 118.4 119 119 119.8 120 120.4 121 121.1 123.2 124 127 ~ 110 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
47 86.9 92 ~ 75 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
26.5 59 60 65.7 68.5 70 72.5 76.2 78.8 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
46
50.6
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
263
260.1
277.8
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
170.6 180 180.6 182.2 182.4 184 184.8 185.1 185.3 185.4 185.8 186.1 186.6 186.8 187 187 187.1 187.3 ~ 184 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
165.6 168.1 168.5 170 175.4 176.8 177.7 180.3 180.9 182.2 182.5 182.5 183.4 184.1 184.5 184.7 184.7 185.1 185.9 185.9 186.4 186.9 187.2 ~ 180 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
134.3 150.1 152.8 155.8 156.9 158.9 165.8 166.8 167.9 169.8 174.1 175 175.7 176.9 178.1 178.3 178.6 179 179.4 180.2 180.3 180.8 181.3 181.6 182.9 183.1 183.1 183.8 ~ 172 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
63.5 74.7 90.4 94.4 94.8 96.5 97.4 102.7 105.9 108.9 112.8 114 115.2 116.1 116.4 116.6 117.2 117.4 117.7 117.8 119.7 119.9 121.4 123 123.2 124.8 125.4 128 130.5 ~ 111 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.9 64.5 72.6 75.5 75.9 80.6 82.3 86.1 86.8 87.6 88.5 88.8 90.6 90.6 92.2 92.8 93.1 93.2 93.2 94.3 94.5 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
53 75 76.9 87.7 88.5 92.5 93.6 93.7 98.7 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
40.5
38.2
40.7
25.9
40.9
36.4
41.5
43.9
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
186.4
185.5
182.7
185.7
172.1
186.2
182.7
68.2
186.3
159.9
185.6
182.1
183.5
184.4
180
173.7
175.8
179.5
169
167
186
175.7
179.2
179.4
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
186.6
187
187.1
181.7
187.4
187.2
73.7
187.3
157.5
187
185.9
185.7
186.6
183
179.2
182.4
184.9
173
186.8
132.1
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 20231561191087848
Alan Wake 279.675.77040.219.8
Lords of the Fallen96.98563452914.6
Total War Pharaoh385.92511561219147.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage143135127987541
EA Sports FC 24192.7162.3150.1138.482.4
Counter-Strike 2182.9170.7141100.655.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty131.7117100895624
Lies of P2061851631449849
The Crew Motorfest6060605939
Starfield65524737.224
Armored Core 6104103998145.2
Immortals of Aveum58473419.7
Atlas Fallen1291211078551
Baldur's Gate 3137.111798956534.2
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart90.47661564933.2
F1 23251250199764622
Diablo 424923020818011360.9
Star Wars Jedi Survivor888476734723
Dead Island 2167.919317116111252.5
The Last of Us958173684530.6
Resident Evil 4 Remake1551211138160
Company of Heroes 322018915214911263
Sons of the Forest98.385828265
Atomic Heart188142937556
Returnal989890765729
Hogwarts Legacy142.797795227.7
Dead Space Remake1009684835426
The Witcher 3 v4.00101855428
High On Life2281771341096725.7
The Callisto Protocol147128123836332.96
Need for Speed Unbound118.1122106937336.2
Spider-Man Miles Morales115946942
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 20221111007243
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection9391858261
A Plague Tale Requiem71625640.923
FIFA 23166.2
The Quarry146122.19868.228.7
F1 22237231186734622
Vampire Bloodhunt212199.9195.7148.678.5
Ghostwire Tokyo172.7171.7165.9108.752.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands213178123956736
Cyberpunk 2077 1.613412097865322
Elex 2118.7118.2112.978.940
GRID Legends182.9164.1150.1131.7112.1
Elden Ring59.659.559.559.545
Dying Light 2956432
Rainbow Six Extraction25324018812564
God of War143.1119.5102746243
Halo Infinite172.7149.1140.6102.557.5
Farming Simulator 22203148.2138.913794.1
Riders Republic1601351218749
Guardians of the Galaxy14814714410860
Back 4 Blood252221209129.473.7
Far Cry 6168.81431351068346
Deathloop139.9129.8106.365.437.4
F1 202142030024114010563.4
Days Gone173.2154.7119.283.845
Resident Evil Village220212189.7128.662.7
Outriders165.3145.2129.49046.3
Hitman 3294.3234208.4197.4129.968.5
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla987342
Watch Dogs Legion130896433
Flight Simulator 2020158.8117.282.564.850.1
Horizon Zero Dawn1431269852
F1 2020331276235183142.6
Borderlands 32171731301037238
Far Cry New Dawn165140135120105
Metro Exodus215141112887045
Shadow of the Tomb Raider206163.416514610557
Strange Brigade44627922519612969
Far Cry 518015314313410958
X-Plane 11.1115713811098
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark2041531118345
Dota 2 Reborn188170159150130
The Witcher 34643582241107564
GTA V1841801721118584
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


10
34

1
18
49

3
30
42

6
39
27
1
19
45
10
16
36
15
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.26
log 16. 00:21:02

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:14:47 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11453 +0.031s ... 0.073s

#7 got single benchmarks 11453 +0.145s ... 0.218s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.218s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.43s ... 1.648s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 1.649s

#11 Got 1806 rows for game benchmarks. +0.77s ... 2.418s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 2.418s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.063s ... 2.481s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +4.156s ... 6.637s

#15 return log +0.076s ... 6.713s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU graphics card

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) review: The RTX 4070 laptop for gamers and creators

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) review: The RTX 4070 laptop for gamers and creators

According to Schenker, the XMG Pro 16 Studio is a "professional workstation for content creation". The specs fit: Core i9, an RTX 4070, Thunderbolt 4 and a 16:1...
Intel Core i9-13900H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.6 kg
SCHENKER XMG Core 16 gaming laptop review - A real competitor to the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16

SCHENKER XMG Core 16 gaming laptop review - A real competitor to the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16

Schenker's Core 16 (Tongfang GM6XG7X) is a great gaming laptop that needn't hide from any of its upper mid-range rivals thanks to its AMD Ryzen 7 and RTX 4070 (...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.4 kg
HP Victus 16 laptop review: Full HD gamer with RTX 4070

HP Victus 16 laptop review: Full HD gamer with RTX 4070

The Victus 16 costs slightly less than an Omen 16 with comparable hardware. Read on to find out whether or which cost-saving measures come to the fore. Our test...
Intel Core i7-13700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.10" | 2.4 kg
HP Omen 16 laptop review: A good choice for gamers even with Zen 4

HP Omen 16 laptop review: A good choice for gamers even with Zen 4

HP's Omen series has been on the market for a few years now. The manufacturer combines AMD and Nvidia hardware in the current 16-inch xf0376ng model. You can fi...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.10" | 2.4 kg
Acer Nitro 17 Ryzen edition review: The QHD gaming laptop with an RTX 4070

Acer Nitro 17 Ryzen edition review: The QHD gaming laptop with an RTX 4070

The present Acer Nitro 17 combines a Ryzen 7 7735HS with a GeForce RTX 4070 for about US$1,900. In this review, you can find out whether this combination can ma...
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 3 kg

Aorus 15 BSF: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Aorus 15 BSF review: The QHD gaming laptop with an RTX 4070 and great runtimes

HP Omen Transcend 16: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » HP Omen Transcend 16 laptop review: More than just a small name difference

SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23): Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  Review » Schenker Vision 16 Pro 2023 review: 1.6 kg light and powerful package with RTX 4070 Laptop

MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » MSI Pulse 17 B13V gaming laptop review: With quiet wings

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG: Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » MSI Stealth 16 Studio laptop review: An extremely light, 16-inch, Core i7, RTX 4070 device for gamers and creators

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 laptop review: Slimmer than the Razer Blade 16

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED review: Multimedia laptop with extreme CPU performance

Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 14 Zen 4 laptop review: Lots of changes that matter

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  Review » Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 review: An RTX 4070 gaming laptop with good battery life

SCHENKER XMG Focus 17 (E23): Intel Core i9-13900HX, 17.30", 2.9 kg
  Review » Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23) in review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 doesn't skimp on performance

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED laptop review: MacBook Pro rival with 120 Hz OLED display

Dell XPS 17 9730 RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 17 9730 laptop review: GeForce RTX 4070 multimedia monster

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  Review » Ryzen 7 7745HX performance debut: Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 laptop review

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 with RTX 4070 in review: High graphics performance in a business-like notebook

Medion Erazer Major X20: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  Review » Medion Erazer Major X20 review: Gaming notebook with RTX 4070 and solid hardware

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  Review » Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 laptop review: Both impressive and underwhelming

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM: Intel Core i9-13900H, 13.40", 1.7 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM Review - Gaming Convertible with RTX 4070 Laptop

Aorus 15X ASF: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Aorus 15X ASF review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 power and stamina

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX Analysis - Zen4 Dragon Range is faster and more efficient than Intel Raptor Lake-HX

Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  Review » Core i7-13700HX performance debut: Uniwill GM6PX7X IDX laptop review

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: Gaming laptop impresses in the test with the new Ryzen 9

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Slim Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED laptop review: Efficient RTX 4070 for gamers and creatives

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI laptop review: Light and shade with the 18-inch gaming machine

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample: Intel Core i9-13900HX
  Review » GeForce RTX 4070, 4060, 4050 Laptop Analysis - Nvidia's new Mainstream Laptop GPUs in Review

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  Review » Razer Blade 18 laptop review: Smaller than many 17-inch gaming laptops

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i RTX4070: Intel Core i9-13905H, 16.00"
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i RTX4070

HP Victus 16-r0077ng: Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-r0077ng

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, i7-13700HX RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, i7-13700HX RTX 4070

Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-76FS: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-76FS

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IRP8, RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13905H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IRP8, RTX 4070

MSI Katana 17 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13620H, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 17 B13VGK

Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-74AS: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-74AS

Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARX8: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARX8

HP Omen Transcend 16-u0027TX: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 16-u0027TX

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51, i7-13700H RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-51, i7-13700H RTX 4070

HP Omen Transcend 16-u0000: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 16-u0000

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8, i7-13700HX RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8, i7-13700HX RTX 4070

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41

Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI

Alienware m16 R1 AMD, RTX 4070: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, 16.00", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Alienware m16 R1 AMD, RTX 4070

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R8UR: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41-R8UR

HP Victus 16-r0000ns: Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.10", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-r0000ns

Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XI: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 13.40", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XI

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 OLED H7604JI: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 OLED H7604JI

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6604JI: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6604JI

Origin PC EON14-S 2023: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EON14-S 2023

MSI Katana 15 B12VGK: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 B12VGK

HP Omen Transcend 16: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 16

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8

HP Omen Transcend 16-u0095ng: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » HP Omen Transcend 16-u0095ng

MSI Crosshair 15 C12VG: Intel Core i7-12650H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Crosshair 15 C12VG

Hyperbook SL606, i9-13900H RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Hyperbook SL606, i9-13900H RTX 4070

MSI Alpha 17 C7VF: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Alpha 17 C7VF

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8: AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8

MSI Creator Z17 HX Studio A13VGT: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » MSI Creator Z17 HX Studio A13VGT

Origin PC EVO16-S 2023: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.10", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Origin PC EVO16-S 2023

Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Acer Nitro 17 AN17-41-R9LN

Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070

MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13VG, i7-13620H: Intel Core i7-13620H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13VG, i7-13620H

Dell XPS 17 9730 RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17 9730 RTX 4070

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, i9-13900HX RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, i9-13900HX RTX 4070

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H, i9-13900HX RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H, i9-13900HX RTX 4070

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 14 2023: Intel Core i9-13905H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 14 2023

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4070

MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13VG: Intel Core i7-13700H, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 14 Studio A13VG

Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71

Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-96HK: Intel Core i9-13900HK, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-96HK

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI, i9-13980HX: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI, i9-13980HX

Gigabyte Aorus 15 BSF: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte Aorus 15 BSF

MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG

MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VG, i7-13700HX

Medion Erazer Major X20: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Major X20

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG: Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JI: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JI

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601VI

MSI Pulse 15 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Pulse 15 B13VGK

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF

Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM: Intel Core i9-13900H, 13.40", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Flow Z13 ACRNM

MSI Katana 15 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13620H, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Katana 15 2023 B13VGK

MSI Vector GP77 13VG: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » MSI Vector GP77 13VG

MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK

Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI: Intel Core i7-13650HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI

Aorus 15X ASF: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Aorus 15X ASF

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 18.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070

XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23): Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » XMG Pro 16 Studio: Lots of power for gamers and creators

HP Victus 16-r0077ng: Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.10", 2.4 kg
   » Affordable HP Victus 15 gaming laptop records massive 33% discount at Best Buy

Aorus 15 BSF: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 2.4 kg
   » Aorus 15 BSF: The RTX 4070 laptop with 10-hour runtimes

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » Asus ROG Strix G17 with RTX 4060, AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and 240Hz QHD display gets US$300 discount in new gaming laptop sale

HP Omen Transcend 16: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » HP Omen Transcend 16 is three steps forward and one step back for the series

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.3 kg
   » Powerful Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 QHD gaming laptop with RTX 4070 and Core i9 on sale with its largest discount yet

MSI Pulse 17 B13VGK: Intel Core i7-13700H, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » MSI Pulse 17 reviewed: Gaming laptop with a questionable price-performance ratio

SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23): Intel Core i7-13700H, 16.00", 1.6 kg
   » Highest performance per kg: Schenker Vision 16 Pro impresses with RTX 4070 Laptop and magnesium case

Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » Small attention to detail on the Lenovo Legion Slim Gen 8 solves an annoying issue on the Alienware x16 r1

Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604: Intel Core i9-13980HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » The ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED is fast, but too loud

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: Intel Core i9-13900H, 14.50", 1.7 kg
   » The Asus Zenbook Pro 14 impresses with a lot of performance and the world's first 120 Hz OLED display

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » A quiet and hot creator laptop: Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 reviewed

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
   » Dell XPS 15 9530 comes with 40 W to 50 W TGP GeForce RTX 4070 graphics

Medion Erazer Major X20: Intel Core i9-13900HX, 16.00", 2.4 kg
   » Medion Erazer Major X20: RTX 4070 notebook with mechanical keyboard

Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070: Intel Core i7-13700HX, 16.00", 2.2 kg
   » First in-house Core i7-13700HX benchmarks show a 25 percent performance boost over the popular Core i7-12700H

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » Focus on gaming performance: Asus ROG Strix G17 with remarkable single purpose

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF: Intel Core i9-13900H, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » New Aero 16 OLED reviewed: OLED and new Intel/Nvidia generations on the rise

Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070: Intel Core i9-13950HX, 18.00", 3 kg
   » Nvidia driver 528.49 is borked on the Blade 18 RTX 4070, Razer says a fix should be coming soon

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Arc A750

Class 2

M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - Benchmarks and Specs
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-12-19)